When divorce causes a sugar arms race

What effect does divorce have on children's health?  The initial stages of many divorces can be very acrimonious.  During custody battles, and in the years after, both parents usually have a strong incentive for the children to like Mommy or Daddy.  More and better Christmas presents.  New toys all the time.  But the easiest way for parents to control (and please) their children is -- you guessed it -- sugar and candy.   The same stuff that we warn children to fear when in the hands of strangers. 

A divorce can make it harder for each parent to make decisions that are in the long term best interests of the child.  Rather than suffer through a tantrum, much better to just give in to his demands for a Kit Kat.  Rather than seem mean, much better to give her a little something sweet.  Don't we have fun when we see Daddy?  He gives us candy.  Don't we have fun when we see Mommy?  She gives us treats.   It's an arms race with no winners.  Denying short term enjoyment is easier to do when you aren't battling with your former spouse for the primary affections of your child.  

I get that there are plenty of married parents who use sugar to control their children.  I get that divorce is sometimes necessary.  I get all that.  That's not what I'm talking about.  Got any perspective on this issue?   Please share it in the comments.

Vegetarian dinner party (British humor)

Brilliantly funny and smart, as the Brits do.  It's Mitchell and Webb.  Thanks to Levi for the pointer.

Breastfeeding...it's what your tits are for

August is National Breastfeeding Month, and this promo video for breastfeeding is awesome and hilarious and SO GOOD.  Just watch it.  Thanks to Pablo for the pointer.  And for those who missed, here is my post on Gisele and breastfeeding -- great comments from readers.

And a little humor that points out the absurdity of our social attitudes on breastfeeding relative to other activities we tolerate...

Updated list of wild animals ignorant of calories

As many of you know, I am compiling a list of wild animals that do not know what a calorie is.  Thanks to all the readers who left additions in the comments.  I am embarrassed by some of my omissions (armadillo, duh).

A reader asks me whether only living species count, or could extinct species be on the list too.  Good question.  Since extinct species are extinct, we cannot say with certainty that they do not know what a calorie is.   It would be different if they had left behind a written record stating their ignorance of calories -- but we have yet to find that record.  So sorry, I cannot put Tiktaalik on the list.  That's called science, people, and unlike in sports, not everyone gets a trophy.
 
Here's the updated list (new animals in bold):
  • Aardvark
  • Armadillo
  • African buffalo
  • Hamadryas Baboon
  • European Beaver
  • Cormorant
  • Dragonfly
  • Fat-tailed Gerbil
  • Hawk
  • Hippopotamus
  • Hyena
  • Llama
  • Moose
  • Panda
  • Pangolin (!)
  • Peacock
  • Australian Pelican
  • Squid
  • Urchin
  • Walrus
 
Any others that I'm missing?
 
I think you enjoy being hard to categorize
Syndicate content