Women

The Debutante Hunters

This film about some Southern belles who hunt just won the audience award at the Sundance Film Festival.  Here's the full thing, it's about 10 minutes long.

I love everything about these women. 

Thanks to Joe for the link.

Vegan yoga instructor warms up to guns

More women are warming up to gun ownership, including this one:

They say they shoot not only for self-protection, but because it relieves stress, helps them find peace and concentration and - feel feminine.

For instance, Deirdre Gailey, who says, "I'm a yoga instructor, I work at a vegan bakery -- and I also like to shoot guns."

Aren't guns and shooting the opposite of yoga's Zen experience?

"Yoga's Zen-like quality can be applied to shooting guns in a lot of ways,' says Gailey. "Shooting guns takes focus, concentration, and it doesn't always have to be about violence."

"(When I cook)," Gailey added, "I use a chef's knife. You have respect for a knife as a tool that you use in your craft. And I think guns can be used in the same way."

I love people who destroy stereotypes.  Where is this women and how can I meet her.

Full article here.

Words of wisdom

"A woman dissatisfied needs luxuries,
  but a woman in love will sleep on a board."

- Zan Perrion from .   

That had me laughing all morning.  That's from Hans, a reader in Romania, in response to my comment that a lady might not want to sleep on the floor.

What the Bible says about women who won't go barefoot

Deuteronomy 28: 56-57:

56 The tender and delicate woman among you, which would not adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness and tenderness, her eye shall be evil toward the husband of her bosom, and toward her son, and toward her daughter,

57 and toward her young one that cometh out from between her feet, and toward her children which she shall bear: for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and straitness, wherewith thine enemy shall distress thee in thy gates.

The lesson is clear.  Beware women who say they are too delicate to run barefoot.  Beware women who get pedicures all the time.

This ancient wisdom is directly in line with my experience here in New York City.

Update: My Biblical interpretation may be off, as one commenter points out, and may be more along the lines of "This is what happens when you disobey...even the tenderest become evil."

(Thanks to Ira for the pointer.)

Gisele Bundchen can be my benevolent dictator

Finally, a reason to write a post about Gisele.  Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bundchen has been stirring up controversy -- in a recent interview with Harper's Bazaar, Gisele spoke about being a new mother, and made a strong statement in favor of breastfeeding:

"Some people [in the United States] think they don't have to breastfeed, and I think 'Are you going to give chemical food to your child when they are so little?' I think there should be a worldwide law, in my opinion, that mothers should breastfeed their babies for six months."

Apparently, the "worldwide law" piece struck some women as a bit smug coming from a wealthy supermodel.

My reaction?  Puh-lease.  Here are 10 reasons why Gisele is in the right.

  • First, as Gisele clarified on her blog, she wasn't making a point about the law.  She was emphasizing the importance of breastfeeding and the strength of her belief.   
  • Second, she's absolutely right that breastfeeding is important, that more women should breastfeed their children, and breastfeed for longer.  (And yes, I said that. And I'm a man. Without any children. Boo ya!)  Just because it may be easier for Giselle to breastfeed than some women, it doesn't mean it's not a worthy goal.
  • Third, it's not as if every other celebrity doesn't sound off about, say, environmental issues every day -- but in that situation, they are actually advocating global laws (e.g., the Kyoto Protocol) to force people to behave a certain way.  So for consistency's sake, I hope you accuse every green-in-the-face celebrity for unmerited opinions and general smugness.
  • Fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, and tenth are attached below (with captions). 

Now that I have found a way to post about Gisele (and her breasts), I've accomplished all of the goals I had for this blog.  So I will be shutting down the site.  Thank you for coming.

Weight Watchers and Jenny Craig don't appeal to men, never will

Jenny Craig and Weight Watchers are both trying to market themselves to men.  Good luck with that.  The only question is which effort is more doomed to failure.  You decide.

Weight Watchers

Weight Watchers has new ads out, saying: "Eat like a man, not like a rabbit."  But the macho tone is so forced -- it's Weight Watchers, people.  That's like Victoria's Secret coming out with a line of men's underwear. Victoria's Secret for Men: "Be her hunk, not her hubby."  (Pretty good tag line actually.)

                   

Jenny Craig

Jenny Craig is in an even tougher position.  The company is named after a woman, which further reinforces all the female associations with weight loss programs and dieting.  So who do they hire as their spokesman?  Maybe some real macho guy to counteract the existing brand equity?  No.  They hire Jason Alexander.  Better known as George from Seinfeld -- brilliantly funny, but bumbling, incompetent at work, physically unfit, unattractive to women (except for women who boss him around), neurotic, and generally pathetic in all things.  Pretty much the exact opposite of what any man should strive to be: self-respecting, decisive, emotionally solid, physically healthy and strong, and confident in yourself and your life's purpose.  (Do all of the above and you will be attractive to women.  Strive for their approval, like George, and they'll either ignore you or walk all over you.) 

Actually, come to think of it, Jason Alexander is a brilliant choice.  Jenny Craig for Men is a weight loss program for men who can be nagged into doing half-measures.  For men who can't decisively do one of two things: 1) Say, "I'm fat.  So what.  Deal with it." or 2) Take their health into their own hands.

Jason Alexander: King of the Pushovers.

Look at the pic they have up of him.  He's wearing a lavender shirt that matches the lavender paisley wall-paper.  (Is that paisley?  I don't know.)   Look, I've got nothing against any particular color -- with the possible exception of Funeral Home Lavender that matches the upholstery.  Wear some purple, man.  And does he look confident?  No.  He looks just as awkward and pathetic as he did on Seinfeld, except this time it's not funny.  Caption contest for what is going through his head in that picture.

If I ran Jenny Craig, I would have created a separately branded sub-line called Daniel Craig.  Or better yet, how about eating and moving like hunter-gatherers in the wild?

My book will be out next year.

          

The Colbert Bump: lactose-intolerant women with celiac

So if you saw my Colbert Report interview, then you heard some of my comments about dating women in New York City.  Too many vegetarians, too many sugar addicts.  (This gourmet cupcake trend cannot die too soon.  The more expensive they are, the easier it is to justify them as a special occasion.)

Near the end of the interview, Colbert and I joked about how my ideal woman is a meat-eating, lactose-intolerant celiac.  And this is where I got my "Colbert Bump".  If you watch Colbert regularly, you know that the Colbert Bump is the boost in popularity that guests receive soon after their appearance -- in book sales, politics, whatever.   Well, my bump was in emails from "celiac chicks" (as my gmail label is called).  I received emails from celiac women not only from all over the country, but all over the world.  It was pretty crazy.   The first wave of emails was from women who saw the show.  The next wave was from women whose friends had seen the interview, sent it to them, and physically forced them to email me.  This did wonderful things for my ego.

But what was amazing about all these emails was how many of them commented that they had never viewed celiac as a positive trait.  It was a disease, a condition, a debilitation.  Yet when you take a step back and look and the broad sweep of human history, you realize that eating grains is a relatively recent development.  Taking the long view, not eating grains is actually quite normal.  And so this evolutionary perspective was a way to create a positive, normal identity.  And in some ways, not just to feel normal, but to feel superior.  As crazy as it may sound, celiacs are actually lucky to have a body that clearly tells them what not to eat.  Pretty cool.  I used to casually smoke in college -- "I only smoke when I drink" -- but I never became a regular smoker because my body rejected it.  I'd get sinus infections if I went through a whole pack myself.  This ended up being a good thing.  Kind of like celiac.

If you view celiac as an abnormal condition, then you try to "eat normally", by buying all sorts of gluten-free imitation products...many of them just as heavily processed and unhealthy as the real thing.  But if you view celiac as a useful signal from your body about what's healthy, then you can create a new normal.  This message came through loud and clear in the emails I received, which was totally awesome and unexpected.

Anyhow, to all you celiac chicks, I've been seeing someone I met about two hours after the Colbert taping, so I've been slow to reply.  But my comment was only partially in jest.  Most folks thought it was funny that I might prefer someone with a "disease" like celiac, but everyone would agree that it's good to date someone who holds similar fundamental values as you do.  Food and health are a big part of that.  The prior girl I went out with ate pizza and Sprite and that's about it.  A few weeks in, she asked me, "If I still eat the way I do a few years from now, are we still going to be going out?"  I paused, looked at her, and simply said: "No."   (Honestly, I think telling her no just made her like me more.)

Keep up the good work, celiac chicks.

Syndicate content