Veganism

Chelsea Clinton's Vegan Wedding

I know you've all been glued to the New York Times live blog of Chelsea Clinton's wedding.  But seriously, people -- who would ever get their celebrity gossip from a respected American newspaper?  For that, we have to cross the Atlantic, where the Brits really know their tabloids.  We turn to the Daily Mail for the inside scoop.

Let's see...the $3M pricetag for the wedding.  The John Jacob Astor venue.  The $1M engagement ring.  The groom's father is a criminal.  Yeah, yeah, yeah -- get to the good stuff.  Ah, now we're talking: the food.

The wedding cake

LET THEM EAT CAKE

 

Chelsea has ordered a £7,000, five-tier, gluten-free wedding cake. 

 

Rumours abound, but  flamboyant designer Ron Ben-Israel is hotly tipped to be the man tasked with the job. 

He created the cake for the gay wedding in the film Sex And The City 2.

 

It's great that gluten-free is really starting to take off.  But a seven thousand pound cake?  Seems a bit excessive to me -- that's three and a half tons.  Also, I didn't see Sex and the City 2 (I'm waiting for it to come out on VHS), but if the cake is half as fabulous as the Sex in the City gourmet cupcakes, it's going to be quite a fabulous cake.

 

She's a vegan

 

WHADDYA MEAN IT'S VEGAN!

Despite her father’s famous predilection for fast food, Chelsea has been a vegan for more than a decade and has instructed society caterer Olivier Cheng to provide vegetarian, vegan, and gluten-free dishes for the wedding feast.

 

Who knew?  I wonder how Bill feels about this.

 

Happily for Bill, there will still be much to please those of a carnivorous bent, with grass-fed, organic beef also on the menu. 

 

Phew.  Can you imagine meat-lovers from Little Rock, Arkansas arriving at a 100% vegan wedding filled with Manhattanites? Now that would have been a spectacle.  Bill lost 20 pounds for the wedding -- looks pretty good.
 

May the newlyweds live happily ever after and please forgive my foray into celebrity food gossip.  The End.

The China Study exposed: actual data does not support vegetarian health claims

Many of you may have heard of The China Study -- an extensive 20-year study of millions of Chinese, their diet, and disease.  T. Colin Campbell, the lead research from Cornell (and outspoken vegan advocate), concludes that we should be eating a plant-based diet devoid of beef, poultry, eggs, fish, and milk.  The China Study has even influenced John Mackey, CEO of Whole Foods, and new Whole Foods dietary recommendations in stores. 

Well, the raw data is in, and the story ain't so pretty.  See the breaking news from Richard Nikoley at Free the Animal, and go straight to the take-down (warning: long!) from former vegan/vegetarian Denise Minger at Raw Foods SOS.

More to come...

Ultra-marathoner Scott Jurek pushing veganism

Ultra-marathoner and vegan Scott Jurek was recently profiled in the NYT.   For those who aren't familiar with Jurek, he's a crazy sick ultra-marathoner who dominates many of these 50 mile, 100 mile, 100+ mile races.  The piece is unique in that it ignores the ethical aspects of veganism and just talks about athletic performance.  Let's see what they have to say.

In college, his diet began to improve, and as he “saw how much disease is lifestyle related,” he began eating “real food, eating the way people have been eating for thousands of years.”

I'm all for real food, but claims to history in favor of real food is not an argument in favor of veganism.

“None of this is weird,” he said. “If you go back 300 or 400 years, meat was reserved for special occasions, and those people were working hard. 

Go back 300 or 400 years?  The 18th century is the benchmark of healthy eating?  To the extent people ate less meat back then it was because they were poor.

"Remember, almost every long-distance runner turns into a vegan while they’re racing, anyway — you can’t digest fat or protein very well.”

There are so many things wrong with that sentence I don't know where to start.

  • You can get fat or protein from plant sources, so that's just a non-sequitur.
  • Just because you're eating carbohydrates while you're running doesn't mean that you're a vegan.   It means you're momentarily a vegetarian, I suppose.
  • And even that assumes that you body isn't using it's own fat or protein stores.  That's kind of like eating an animal.
  • Also, most of these distance racers are eating heavily processed energy gels and bars -- not "real food", much less vegan food.

All it takes is one look at a long-distance runner's body to see that they have little muscle mass and they're all skin and bones.  Hence my choice of picture.

He said he needed 5,000 to 8,000 calories a day, “and I get that all from plant sources. It’s not hard, either. I like to eat, and I don’t have to worry about weight management. All I need is a high-carbohydrate diet with enough protein and fat.”

My emphasis.  If you're eating 8,000 calories a day, good luck getting it from fat and protein -- you'll be too full.  Interesting...to maximize caloric intake, eat a high-carbohydrate diet.  Wait, isn't that what we're told to do to minimize caloric intake too?  Which is it?

I'm not saying that Scott Jurek is eating the wrong way -- God, no.  He's a super-star athlete, his achievements are mind-blowing, and if he says a vegan diet helps him achieve that, then I'm not going to suggest otherwise.  By eating a high carbohydrate diet, he's training his body to use carbohydrate as fuel, which is probably essential for his type of long-distance exertions.

But should we eat like Michael Phelps, with his 12,000 calories a day of chocolate-chip pancakes, energy drinks, and pizza?  No.  And we shouldn't eat like Scott Jurek either.

   

Syndicate content